The end is nigh: Top record labels are reportedly creating AI-generated music

• By h1L4ry
• 24 May, 2023
• No Comments

Universal Music and Google explore legitimate AI music tool

“And for me those feelings have been concern and sympathy.” In response, he has released a “series of comforting live performances for AI” (emphasis mine). Having said all of that, I could imagine that advertising could really benefit from it as long as all of the permissions were in order. Mimicry has always been a cornerstone of the advertising world, and it’s often at its best when it recreates famous film scenes or re-records well known classics. I could just imagine Haribo replacing the kids’ voices with the ‘Rat Pack’. You can have that one for free, but generally, imitation or impersonation is nowhere near as popular as it was when I was growing up.

This extends to brands owning adaptable voices for consistent communication across all of their touchpoints. In this regard, human-crafted music remains paramount, as affiliations with cultural icons facilitate a deeper connection with audiences. While acknowledging the significance of established artists, there is also a growing focus on nurturing partnerships with emerging talent across diverse niches. This approach not only champions authentic storytelling, but also aligns brands with emerging cultural trends. The evolving landscape of music and technology necessitates a balanced perspective that welcomes AI integration while preserving the distinctive value of human-crafted music.

Key Music Moments From The Coronation

If someone did not want to pay the market rate for an established artist’s music, they could utilise AI software to create their similar sounding, imitation music which do not earn royalties. In respect of the intellectual property rights for creators of the original material, we can refer to a similar case where Getty Images sued Stability AI for scraping its content illegally without permission – read our article on this here. There is also the real possibility that AI-generated music purporting to be of a particular artist may be critically and publicly derided—which may raise concern that a band’s goodwill and reputation could take a hit.

• This shareable PDF can be hosted on any platform or network and is fully compliant with publisher copyright.
• Lastly, Principle #3 talks about how even though generative AI going to require a lot of work to manage on the platform, it can also be used as a tool to fight against copyright abuse on the site.
• I could just imagine Haribo replacing the kids’ voices with the ‘Rat Pack’.
• Another emotional argument against AI music is its inability to mimic cultural, historical, or societal values.
• Users have 2 weeks from November 2, 2022, to claim their print, which will begin shipping 3-6 weeks after the 2-week window closes.

The new AI system created by Google, for example, would seem to be able to produce music of any genre from a simple textual description. Although this is not the first generative AI system for music, it is, on the other hand, the first to create “high fidelity” (HiFi) songs and melodies, i.e., high resolution (with sounds generated at 24KHz). This algorithm can also generate music with “complex composition,” having been trained with data from more than 280,000 hours of music. MusicLM can build on existing sounds, melodies, and songs regardless of how they are played, i.e., even if whistled, sung, or played on an instrument, thus potentially proving capable of replacing most soundtrack composers. AI-generated music could provide an effectively unlimited supply of music in an industry which the major labels see as already over-saturated with the proliferation of so-called “fake artists” and “functional music” on streaming services. Given licensing costs and the complex royalty flows in the music industry, it may even be that (paradoxically) if AI-generated music does not attract copyright protection, it is in a better position to undercut human-made copyright music.

Articles, Media & Podcasts

Bach’s music that I used in an earlier project for a piece called “Turing Test//Prelude”, which was implemented for me by Parag Mital. The generations produced by Clara were interesting in many ways, and I was able to analyse them to identify shared qualities, which I expanded upon by composing many more “generations” of my own. AI has become a hot topic in the music industry in recent months, with new examples each week of astonishing AI-generated music, and concerns voiced about the “widespread and lasting harm” of such tools to music creators and rightsholders. Conversations about the legal and ethical implications of AI in creative fields are ongoing, but they raise a critical question. How are consumer perceptions of generative AI evolving as new applications emerge? DISQO’s new report examines how consumer attitudes toward generative AI have changed since our initial reporting in February, and offers insights about how AI perceptions differ by application area (music, news, entertainment, etc.).

Copyright allows artists and labels to protect their sound recordings (as well as the literary and musical works that underpin them) from copycats. However, the current UK copyright regime does not protect the timbre of an artist’s voice, only a sound recording of it. AI-cloning technology uses deep learning and text-to-speech software to recreate a particular voice. If protected sound recordings of a particular artist’s voice have been used to train the system in the UK, this is likely to give rise to copyright infringement. However, a more complex (and currently unresolved) question is whether the resulting outputs of the trained system are also an infringement of any copyright in the training data. Artists may; therefore, consider alternative routes to prevent the re-use of their voice, such as an action for passing off, if there is a misrepresentation that the AI-generated output is a recording of their voice.

The Government response decided not to make any changes to the existing law on the subsistence or ownership of copyright in computer-generated works – leaving open this uncertainty. Given the low levels of support we see for AI-generated music, we sought to examine consumers’ primary concerns about this domain. Image and personality rights are another hugely contentious area when it comes to AI which can create an almost exact likeness of an individual creator. While countries like America have rules on image rights, there are no such specific protections in UK law and that is another key area that needs to be addressed urgently. The next time a new piece of AI music goes viral, remember that we won’t know what content the AI that produced it was trained on, and we won’t know whether or not consent was given to use that content to train the AI.

TECH NEWS & REVIEWS

The possibilities are endless, allowing you to explore new creative avenues and stand out from the crowd. Create royalty-free unique soundtracks for your videos using VEED’s generative AI-powered text-to-music tool. BloombergGPT has led to create some unique outputs, such as generating initial drafts of Securities and Exchange Commission filings, summarizing financial content into headlines, and reducing the cost of filing.

The future of the BBC Proms hangs in the balance, with cuts looming, gender imbalance rife and post-Brexit travel woes. But Hattie Butterworth argues it’s a testament to the artform’s resilience. Selecting a region may change the language and promotional content you see on the Adobe Stock web site. This shareable PDF can be hosted on any platform or network and is fully genrative ai compliant with publisher copyright. Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings, help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them. In a recent study published in the journal Nature, experts from Google and Japan’s Osaka University say they have developed an AI model that can reconstruct music from brain scans.

Continuing to invest in AI-powered technology to protect the community of viewers, creators, artists and songwriters. Last week, the DJ David Guetta played an AI-created piece of music imitating the rapper Eminem at a concert using lyrics generated by ChatGPT and a voice generation service. Meanwhile, back in the UK, real life humans are getting even more genrative ai creative with the new online medium. Meet AIsis, an AI cover band of Oasis who obviously don’t exist outside of a computer, but have created the 33-minute album The Lost Tapes, which actually sound like discarded Beady Eye B-sides. ” said Jon Claire, one of the people who penned the original songs and applied Liam Gallagher soundalike vocals via AI.

Consumer experience with – and perspectives about – generative AI will continue to play a key role in shaping successful AI adoption; keeping a close pulse on their attitudes and behaviors has never been more important. The brilliant global Human Artistry Campaign has set out clear principles that must underpin this debate. As the collective voice for the UK music industry, UK Music has already signed up to those principles.

Misregulate AI and you could have songs and videos of artists seemingly endorsing campaigns they don’t agree with or products with which they would not want to be connected. However, too often people are illicitly using music to train AI technologies without any regard to copyright and without the consent of those who made the music or whose personal identity is being used. It might seem novel and ground-breaking, but it’s important to remember that these are not “creations” in the genuine sense; it impacts on the creators and performers involved, as well as all those who support, invest in, and work with them. Universal Music general counsel Jeffrey Harleston told US lawmakers his displeasure at the practice of capitalizing on artists’ voices. Artists themselves may want to exploit AI technology and legitimately build its uses into their own music. However, there is legitimate concern that it is seen as a threat to the livelihood of musicians and artists.

Textual representation then creates the picture of signal to be rendered sound. The artist, patten earlier this year released Mirage FM,  ‘the first album’ composed using Riffusion. Applications and platforms capable of creating music online include, for example, AIVA, Endel, Xhail, Boomy, Score/Amper, Jukebox, MuseNet, ChatGPT, and, although not yet available, Google’s MusicLM.

In Sonic Alchemy, a new artist will be highlighted each week, starting with Alida Sun, followed by Boreta, Joëlle Snaith and finally, Elias Jarzombek. Sun and Boreta’s pieces are sold as unique works – there will be one owner – while Snaith’s piece is a series of seven, each in a limited edition of 5. The notion of generative becomes but an echo of the process at the root of each work. Audio as datastream requires less data than the 2D matrices of visual image, meaning that it was digitised, processed and manipulated decades before video. How might musical form become part of the debates surrounding the blockchain?

While it is intriguing to see your favourite artist covering songs you wished they had, it is important to note that these songs are not real and were produced without consent from original artists. Generative AI is a promising new technology that has the potential to revolutionize the way we interact with computers. By combining generative AI with NLP and NLG, we can create systems that can understand and process human language more effectively, and that can generate more creative and engaging content. According to reports, Google and Universal Music Group are exploring the idea of licensing artist’s voices and melodies for AI-generated music. The discussions could include talks about developing a legal tool for fans to create music via AI.